The Booker
Shortlist
 | "What they said about ... the Booker
shortlist" (Guardian, 18
September 2003, p. 30: |
The chairman of the Man Booker prize panel described this year's
shortlist, announced on Tuesday, as a "giant-killers' list."
Few pundits disagreed with John Carey's assessment. Ditching the literary
heavyweights - Martin Amis, JM Coetzee and Graham Swift
- the judges produced a list featuring an unprecedented four women, three
debut novels, and only one established writer, Margaret Atwood.
Monica Ali's Brick Lane, Atwood's Oryx and Crake, Damon Galgut's The Good
Doctor, Zoe Heller's Notes on a Scandal, Clare Morrall's Astonishing
Splashes of Colour and DBC Pierre's Vernon God Little made for a "fun,
surprising shortlist", said the Daily Telegraph 's Kate Summerscale.
"Though it seems to favour new, little-known or female novelists, this is
in no way a fashionable or worthy list . . . The Man Booker should be
prepared to champion good, difficult books - if it doesn't, which prize
will? - but this year the best books might simply be the most enjoyable
ones."
Tim Lott had also crossed his fingers for a readable shortlist. "The
Booker prize has, for much of its history, been anthrax for the average
reader," he moaned in the London Evening Standard . But last year's winner
- Yann Martel's Life Of Pi - had shown "that the Booker is gradually
waking up to the fact that readers count". With a little courage and
vision, said Lott, the panel could "consign elitism to the dustbin for
good . . . (and) make the Booker a prize not only for a great book but for
a great read".
Robert McCrum, the Observer 's literary editor, joined Lott in the
anti-elitist camp. Writing before the shortlist was published, he called
on the powers-that-be at the Booker to widen the scope of the prize. After
35 years of championing Irish and Commonwealth literature, it was time the
Booker acknowledged the "American contribution". Otherwise, he warned,
this "cornerstone of our cultural heritage . . . will end up looking like
a cross between a lottery and a road accident".
Celia Brayfield did not share McCrum's reverence. "I don't know who will
win the Booker prize but I'll put money on one thing: it'll be ugly," she
wrote in the Times . "There will be tantrums, bile, hissy fits, pouting,
flouncing, foot-stamping, slagging-off, vile imputations, harsh words,
character assassination and tears before bedtime." To be honest, she said,
"I just wish they'd hurry up and hand over the bloody prize so that the
lads can quit bitching." --Sam Jones
 | "Year of Enjoyment" (Kate Summerscale, Telegraph,
17 September 2003, p. 19): This year's Man Booker judges have
arrived at a fun, surprising shortlist: half of the novels are debuts - a
first in Booker history - and more than half are by women. Women have not
dominated a Booker shortlist for more than 20 years.
The judging panel was clearly not swayed by reputation - having dispensed
with Peter Carey, Peter Ackroyd, Pat Barker and Rose Tremain before the
longlist stage, they have now thrown out Graham Swift, JM Coetzee and
Martin Amis.
Amis's omission, though the most newsworthy, is the least surprising.
His novel Yellow Dog has caused almost universal dismay among
critics and fans. Even those who defend the novel - rightly pointing out
that it has wonderful passages - do not claim it as his best work. Of
the big names, only the former Booker winner Margaret Atwood remains. Her
Oryx and Crake is a dark fantasy about genetic mutation and environmental
collapse. . . .
|
|
| |

This site is featured in

BBC Education Web Guide


Site maintained by James Diedrick,
author of
Understanding Martin Amis, 2nd edition (2004).
All contents © 2004.
Last updated
10 December, 2004.
Please read the Disclaimer
|